Emergencies Unit for Ethiopia
(EUE)
United
Nations Support Office, Awassa (UNSO)
Phone: 06-20
70 64/5 Fax: 06-20
70 63
e-mail:
unawassa@telecom.net.et
EUE-UNSO-Field Report SNNPR No. 4
Green
maize for Addis
Local
impact on family food security
Assessment Mission: 25
27 June 2003
|
Population pressure, which is the main factor for serious land shortage, crop diseases (mainly bacterial wilt of enset), livestock disease (tryps) and human diseases (mainly malaria) represent the major socio-economic constraints to the community. Furthermore, untimely onset, erratic distribution and untimely cessation of rains are common and major constraints in the food production system of the area. The zone receives a bimodal type of seasonal rains: belg (February-May) and meher (June September).
The main staple food crops grown in Walayta zone include; false banana (enset), maize, sweet potato and other root crops. Commonly maize is intercropped (planting at least two types of crops at the same time on the same plot of land) with haricot beans, the latter being a companion crop. By practicing intercropping, farmers try to minimize the risk of harvest failure.
Maize, which is the main focus of this study, is planted in April in the lowlands as opposed to the midland areas, where it is usually planted in February/March. The planting and harvesting season varies, based mainly on soil type and agro-ecology related variants. Farmers who have access to wet land areas (water logged/swampy nature) have relative advantages and opportunities of production and are in a better position to reap reasonable harvests even if precipitation is scarce and moisture stress is otherwise high due to the erratic nature of rains.
The study area Damot Gale woreda is dominated by a midland agro-ecological setting where maize is planted in February/March and harvested as green maize by May. In the same woreda, in areas along the Addis-Soddo main road (including Warite Balaqa and Shanto kebeles) green maize starts being sold as of May. Green maize is ready at the time when teff is planted, which in practice often means that fields with green maize are cleared for sowing teff.
This study examines the rationale behind the farmer’s action and tries to find out whether their action makes sense or is detrimental to their own food security. The quick study from this practice was conducted in the last week of June 2003 in Damot Gale woreda of Walayta, one month after people there, mainly women and girls, started with the large scale sale of green, cooked and roasted maize along the road.
Market
and field visits as well as group discussions were made together with farmers,
both male and female, and with woreda agronomists. There seems to be a
common consensus that a mechanism should be established, which helps farmers
to keep their product to feed themselves,
rather than selling it at a dumping prices and later on becoming dependent
on relief food - which unfortunately
is the practice at the moment.
In numerous places along the road green maize is currently being sold in large quantities. A major trading hub for green maize is Shanto market, 5 km off the main road in Damote Gale woreda. Huge piles of green maize are loaded onto small traders’ trucks, with destination Addis Ababa and its roadside markets. The price for 5 or 6 cobs of green maize at Shanto market is one Ethiopian Birr (ETB), half of what green maize costs in Addis.
In a time
span of only three and a half hours the mission observed 10
trucks filled with green maize travelling from Boditi via Shashemene to
Addis. At the same time when green maize is shipped out in large quantities,
bags of dry maize are transported in the other direction in the form of
food aid.
The same
woreda where the study was conducted is currently host to three therapeutic
feeding centres (TFCs) (Boditi, Buge and Ade Damote) filled with emaciated
and malnourished children. Large segments of its most vulnerable population
only survive thanks to dry rations by the government and targeted supplementary
food distributions by MSF/Switzerland. This
shows that while abundance fosters business, it does not at the same time
also improve availability of food for those who would need it most for
plain survival.
Planting
and harvesting time of major crops, grown in the study area and Walayta
zone in general
|
|
|
Maize
|
February/March
|
May/June
|
Teff*
|
Mid-March
|
June
|
August
|
October/November
|
|
Sorghum
|
March
|
December
|
Sweet potato*
|
October (main
produce)
|
March
|
May (for sustaining
planting materials)
|
October
|
|
Irish Potato
|
December
|
March
|
Haricot bean*
|
February/March
(maize intercropped), as a main production
|
May
|
July (for planting
material)
|
November
|
*double
cropped (harvested twice in a year).
Porcupines and human thieves rob the fields during the night, this also puts pressure on the maize growers to cash in maize as soon as it is sellable.
It is also apparent that the farmers have accepted hunger as a common episode during certain times of the year in their area, even in “normal” times. A farmer in Shanto kebele responded to the question why he sells maize when he knows that hunger is looming in the future: “I know hunger as much as hunger knows me”. The farmers know the effects of food shortage, including death, but presently have little choice other than risking their future for the benefit of the present. Motto: “eat today - die tomorrow”.
Crop
producers often do not have the option to keep their produce until the
prices improve, since many of them must honor commitments. If they did
not sell green maize they would be forced to sell other assets small
animals and, when worse comes to worst, even their oxen or essential food
for consumption. Farmers, however, dislike selling productive assets like
shoats, cattle and chickens. In bad times they sell what fetches the best
price at the time and is least important for future survival. The sale
of green maize is often the only alternative to the sale of chickens, shoats
or even cattle. Availability
of credits is important for poor rural communities like the one in Walayta.
But timing of loan repayment should not be linked to green
maize harvests. It should also
not be dictated by creditors. Repayments of credits provided by government
and NGO programs should be negotiated in favor of the farmer in a way that
he can repay his dept at a time when he benefits from a favorable market
price for his produce.
In
times of drought and food shortage farmers should be provided emergency
seeds free of charge and without
any precondition in hard hit areas, whether they are indebted from previous
credits or not. The current practice that farmers, who have old agricultural
credits, do not receive new ones should be abolished.
Institutionalizing subsidies
in kind, in the form of seeds, fertilizers and animals (possibly by means
of vouchers and fairs) could be a way to increase the food security among
impoverished farmers, which should be seriously studied. Subsidizing farmers
is definitely cheaper than providing relief food. It would also revive
the farmers’ ability to survive by their own efforts and reduce their dependency
in the long term.
The
practice of polygamy is a major threat to food security since it increases
the risk of HIV/AIDS. The disease kills not only productive family members.
It also increases the burden on relatives, who have to donate large amounts
of valuable and limited food for funerals. Information drives aimed at
cultural change and focused on sexual behavior,
should be considered by the relevant partners.
DISCLAIMER
This
report is provided for information purposes only and is in no way to be
considered as a comprehensive assessment of the situation in SNNPR.
The
designations employed and the presentation of material in this document
do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the UN concerning
the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities,
or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
March
31, 2003
UN-EUE
Tel.: (251) (1) 51-37-25
PO Box 60252 Fax: (251) (1) 51-12-92
www.sas.upenn.edu/African_Studies/eue_web/eue_mnu.htm
(archive)
References
1.Dechassa
L (1999). Field situation Assessment: North Omo Zone (Walayta), SNNPR.
UN OCHA EUE Field Assessment Report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
2.Dechassa
L (2003). Situation update for Walayta Zone, SNNPR. UN OCHA EUE Field Situation
Assessment Report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.