AFRICAN STUDIES CENTER - UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
 

Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 1/2, 06/01/09



Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 1

AfricaFocus Bulletin
Jun 1, 2009 (090601)
(Reposted from sources cited below)

Editor's Note

"Our first demand in our new campaign ["Demand Dignity"] is to the G-2 leaders, USA and China. The United States does not accept the notion of economic, social and cultural rights while China does not respect civil and political rights. We call on both governments to sign up to all human rights for all." - Irene Khan, Amnesty International

This blunt statement, at the launch of the 2009 Amnesty International annual report on the state of the world's human rights, marks a dramatic evolution in the focus of the work of the organization, founded 48 years ago. Like other international human rights organizations, such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty has in recent years increasingly stressed the connection between social and economic rights and their previous primary focus, on civil and political rights. The global economic recession, Amnesty notes in its latest report and new campaign, makes that connection even more inescapable.

This AfricaFocus Bulletin contains Ms. Khan's speech at the report launch on May 27, and excerpts from her foreword to the report, which elaborates on the same themes. The full report, with additional background materials, is available at http://thereport.amnesty.org/press-area/en

Another AfricaFocus Bulletin sent out today contains the full-text of the regional overview for sub-Saharan Africa in the report. The Amnesty report also includes sections on the Middle East & North Africa, on other world regions, and on 157 individual countries.


Many thanks to those of you who have responded to the most recent appeal for voluntary subscription payments to support AfricaFocus Bulletin. If you haven't yet, and are able to do so, please help AfricaFocus reach more people with reliable information on Africa. Send in a check or pay on-line through Paypal or Google Checkout. See http://www.africafocus.org/support.php for details.

++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++++++++

Irene Khan's Speech

May 27, 2009

http://thereport.amnesty.org/press-area/en/irene-khans-speech

Welcome everyone to the launch of our Amnesty International Report 2009. This report reflects the state of the world's human rights in 157 countries from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe for the period of January to December 2008.

Our report this year is different from previous years. That is because we are living in a different world. The global economic crisis has changed the world as has the emergence of the G-20 leaders. Our report too is different. It takes a holistic approach -- highlighting economic, social and cultural rights as well as political and civil rights. It draws attention to deprivation, insecurity, discrimination and the suppression of people's voice around the world.

There are two key messages to which I want to draw your attention:

First, world leaders are focussed on the economic crisis. We say to them: it's not just the economy. It's injustice, insecurity, inequality and indignity.

Second, world leaders need to put human rights at the centre of their economic rescue plan -- but to be credible leaders they need also to fix their own appalling human rights records.

Let me start with the first key message of our report 2009 the underlying the global economic crisis is an explosive human rights crisis. A combination of social, economic and political problems has created a time bomb of human rights abuses.

  • The economic downturn has aggravated pre-existing human rights problems.

  • It has created new human rights problems.

  • It is diverting attention and resources from many burning human rights problems.

This ticking bomb was not created overnight -- it is the result of decades of human rights failures -- decades in which governments failed to deliver on their human rights promises and commitments.

I do not use the analogy of a time bomb lightly. Billions of people face shortage of food, jobs, clean water, land and housing. They face deprivation and discrimination, growing inequality, and insecurity, xenophobia and racism, violence and repression.

Boom times did not improve their situation -- the bust will bring more suffering because of the failure of governments to uphold human rights.

To give you some concrete examples:

  • A billion people live in slums around the world without basic services or security of tenure or physical security. We documented forced evictions in 24 countries in our report. Millions of people were forcibly evicted or uprooted to make way for economic development projects, 150,000 in Cambodia, 2 million over the past few years in Nigeria, hundreds and thousands in India.

  • Latin American is the most unequal region in the world. Our report shows Indigenous communities in every Latin American country worse off than the rest of the population, deprived, discriminated, marginalized, denied health care, clean water, education and adequate housing.

  • Migrant workers fuelled the global economy but are being discriminated and exploited from Central America to the Middle East. China built its economy on the back of millions of migrant workers who moved from the villages to the cities but who were denied health, education and residence rights in the cities. 20 million migrant workers in China lost their jobs last year and were sent back to the countryside where they face worse conditions.

  • In Europe, the Roma face the most profound and systematic discrimination and marginalization, excluded from public life, segregated in schools and ghettos, facing hostility and violence.

  • The food crisis pushed more people into poverty. It was aggravated by discrimination and political manipulation in countries like Zimbabwe and North Korea. In Sri Lanka, the government and the LTTE armed group denied access to humanitarian organizations to provide food and aid to trapped civilians. The war is now over but the government is still refusing full and free access to national and international organizations although the displaced persons are in desperate material need and also risk of serious human rights violations.

Much of the discrimination that I have highlighted is not of course the direct result of the economic downturn, but the downturn is likely to aggravate the problem. Those who are marginalized, poor and discriminated will feel the brunt of the economic downturn more sharply than others as governments tighten their belts, as social tensions increase and as extremist views take hold.

The economic downturn will also reinforce the tendency of governments to introduce restrictions against refugees, asylum seekers and migrants. Last year borders pushed outwards from Europe into Africa as countries like Spain and Italy signed agreements with Mauritania and Libya to stop people from entering Europe, and such agreements act as a license for more human rights violations in the transit countries.

The economic downturn is generating new threats to human rights. There are growing signs of social discontent and political violence. South Africa saw one of the worst cases of xenophobic and racist attacks last year. In other countries, when people took to the streets to protest desperate social, economic and political conditions governments responded very harshly. Amnesty International's report documents protests in 17 countries, which were met with excessive force. In Cameroon 100 people were shot dead. In Tunisia, two people died, hundreds were injured and many persons were prosecuted and imprisoned following labour unrests.

There is a real risk that the recession could lead to more repression. I say that also because in many countries, open markets have not led to open societies. Two of the clearest examples in our report are Russia and China but they are unfortunately not the only ones. Human rights activists, journalists, lawyers, trade unionists, and other civil society leaders were harassed, attacked or killed with impunity in every region of the world.

Freedom is an asset that needs to be developed, not undermined at a time when governments are seeking to stimulate the economy.

After 9/11 we saw human rights trampled in the name of security -- after 9/15 (the day Wall Street crashed) human rights we see are now being relegated to the back seat in the name of economy.

Our report highlights three key areas that are being neglected:

  • violence against women

  • torture and ill-treatment, and poor policing

  • armed conflicts.

And I refer you to our report for more information on those issues. I will just say a word about armed conflicts.

>From Gaza to Darfur, from eastern Democratic Republic of Congo to

northern Sri Lanka the international community has stood impotent or immobile or inadequate in its response, doing too little too late to protect civilians. The priorities need to be re-set. If we look at Somalia, governments are pouring money into protecting the shipping lanes off the coast of Somalia but doing very little to stop the shipment of arms into the country that fuel conflict and feed human rights abuses.

Impunity for war crimes was allowed to flourish -- in the case of Gaza, it was the USA and western governments, in the case of Darfur, it was the Arab League and the African Union. The myopia of misguided solidarity does no good either to justice or to security.

If governments ignore deadly conflicts or undermine human rights in the name of security, they will promote political instability which will undermine economic recovery. One just needs to look at the rapidly deteriorating crisis on the borders of Afghanistan/Pakistan to see the truth of that statement.

So our message is: governments must focus on the human rights crisis alongside the economic crisis. Ignoring one crisis to focus on another is a sure recipe for aggravating both. Economic recovery will be neither sustainable nor equitable if governments fail to tackle human rights abuses that drive and deepen poverty, or that if they leave unaddressed the armed conflicts that are generating more human rights abuse.

Now I turn to the second point that we are making in our report and that is: the world needs a new global deal on human rights, a new kind of leadership. The world doesn't need another treaty, the world doesn't need any more paper promises -- what it needs is real commitment and concrete action from governments.

The G-20 has emerged to lead the economic revival -- but human rights have barely figured in their economic diagnosis or in their prescription and worse still their own record on human rights is marred by old failed approaches. They may be new leaders but as far as human rights goes they are using very old approaches which is of open denial and violation of human rights; rhetoric without action; promoting human rights abroad but ignoring them at home; sometimes shielding allies from accountability -- that in plain language sums up the collective performance of the G-20 human rights record.

  • Amnesty International recorded torture in 15 of the 19 countries that make up the G20.

  • Three members of the G-20 were responsible for 3/4 of all executions that took place in the world. (China, Saudi Arabia and the USA being the worst offenders)

  • Their individual record is no better. Saudi Arabia severely restricts women's rights. Brazil has a notorious record on the excessive use of police force. Saudi Arabia, China and Russia do not tolerate political dissent. The EU has failed to come clean on renditions or to live up to international standards on refugees and asylum seekers.

  • Yes, of course the decision of the new US Administration to close Guantanamo and end secret detention and torture is very welcome and a breath of fresh air for us. Amnesty International is very proud of that change -- some of you will remember that 4 years ago in this building I called for the closure of Guantanamo and not many people supported Amnesty International at that time. But now the entire war on terror has been discredited. Of course there are still some big questions hanging over whether and how the Obama Administration will bring full closure, disclosure and accountability. We urge President not to falter or relent -- the world is looking to him for leadership, accountable, responsible leadership on human rights.

A Global Deal on human rights must begin with those sitting at top table. First, they have to set to their own tarnish records straight. They must use peer pressure on each other to improve performance. The USA and the European Union must call on China to improve its human rights record -- and China must do the same with Myanmar and Sudan, and South Africa must do so with Zimbabwe.

They will have no credibility as global leaders if they fail to uphold global values of human rights. We are calling on them not simply to flaunt their political and economic clout but to show moral leadership. Nor will they be effective in their goal of economic recovery. If economic recovery is to be sustainable or equitable, then human rights abuses must be put at the centre of those efforts. Governments need to invest in human rights as purposefully as they are investing in the economy.

Tomorrow it will be 48 years since Amnesty International was born. We mark that anniversary by taking up the cause of prisoners of poverty with as much determination as we once took up the cause of prisoners of conscience. As I release the AI report 2009, I am also announcing the launch of our new campaign to Demand Dignity. You will find more information on it outside this room, and at the bottom of the press release.

Our first demand in our new campaign is to the G-2 leaders, USA and China. The United States does not accept the notion of economic, social and cultural rights while China does not respect civil and political rights. Both governments, we call on them to sign up to all human rights for all.

Some of you may say this is a pipe dream of Amnesty International -- but look at what we have achieved the last year. The closure of Guantanamo, the conviction of Fujimori in Peru, the opening of the first trial of the International Criminal Court, the arrest and transfer of Karadzic to the Hague, the reiteration by the UN for a universal moratorium on the death penalty with ever increasing numbers of governments supporting it, the banning of female genital mutilation in Egypt, 147 countries voting for an Arms Trade Treaty. It is possible to bring about change.

Thank you.


It's Not Just the Economy, It's a Human Rights Crisis

Irene Khan

[Selected excerpts from Foreword to Amnesty International 2009 Report, released May 28, 2009. The full report and additional briefing materials are available at http://thereport.amnesty.org/press-area/en]

In September 2008 I was in New York to attend the UN high-level meeting on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the internationally agreed targets to reduce poverty by 2015. Delegate after delegate talked about the need for more funds to eradicate hunger, to cut preventable deaths of infants and pregnant women, to provide clean water and sanitation, to educate girls. The life and dignity of billions of people were at stake, but there was only limited will to back up the talk with money. As I left the UN building I could see the ticker tapes running a very different story coming from another part of Manhattan: the crash of one of the largest investment banks on Wall Street. It was a telling sign of where world attention and resources were really focused. Rich and powerful governments were suddenly able to find many more times the sums that could not be found to stem poverty. They poured them with abundance into failing banks and stimulus packages for economies that had been allowed to run amok for years and were now running aground.

By the end of 2008, it was clear that our two-tier world of deprivation and gluttony -- the impoverishment of many to satisfy the greed of a few -- was collapsing into a deep hole.

As with the case of climate change, so too with global economic recession: the rich are responsible for most of the damaging action, but it is the poor who suffer the worst consequences. While no one is being spared the sharp bite of the recession, the woes of the rich countries are nothing compared with the disasters unfolding in poorer ones. From migrant workers in China to miners in Katanga in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), people desperately trying to drag themselves out of poverty are feeling the brunt sharply. The World Bank has predicted 53 million more people will be thrown into poverty this year, on top of the 150 million hit by the food crisis last year, wiping out the gains of the last decade. International Labour Organization figures suggest that between 18 and 51 million people could lose their jobs. Skyrocketing food prices are leading to more hunger and disease, forced evictions and foreclosures to more homelessness and destitution.

...


Billions of people are suffering from insecurity, injustice and indignity. This is a human rights crisis.

...

>From recession to repression

On the one hand, we face the grave danger that rising poverty and desperate economic and social conditions could lead to political instability and mass violence. On the other, we may well end up in a situation where recession could be accompanied by greater repression as beleaguered governments -- particularly those with an authoritarian bent -- clamp down harshly on dissent, criticism and public exposure of corruption and economic mismanagement.

We had a taste in 2008 of what could lie ahead for 2009 and beyond. When people took to the streets to protest against rising food prices and the dire economic conditions, in many countries even peaceful protests were met with tough responses. In Tunisia strikes and protests were put down with force, causing two deaths, many injuries and more than 200 prosecutions of alleged organizers, some culminating in long prison sentences. In Zimbabwe, political opponents, human rights activists and trade union representatives were attacked, abducted, arrested and killed with impunity. In Cameroon, following violent demonstrations as many as 100 protesters were shot dead and many more imprisoned.

In times of economic stress and political tensions, there is need for openness and tolerance so that dissatisfaction and discontent can be channelled into constructive dialogue and the search for solutions. Yet, it is precisely in these circumstances that the space for civil society is shrinking in many countries. Human rights activists, journalists, lawyers, trade union representatives and other civil society leaders are being harassed, threatened, attacked, prosecuted without justification or killed with impunity in every region of the world.

...


New kind of leadership

Deprivation, inequality, injustice, insecurity and oppression are the hallmarks of poverty. They are clearly human rights problems and will not yield to economic measures alone. They demand strong political will and a comprehensive response integrating political, economic, social and environmental issues within an overarching framework of human rights and the rule of law. They demand collective action and a new kind of leadership.

Economic globalization has brought about a shift in geopolitical power and a new generation of states, in the form of the G-20, is claiming the mantle of world leadership. Composed of China, India, Brazil, South Africa and other emerging economies from the global South as well as Russia, USA and leading western economies, the G-20 claims to be a more accurate representation of political power and economic clout in the world today. That may be so, but to be truly global leaders, the G-20 must subscribe to global values and confront their own tarnished records and double standards on human rights.

...

It is incumbent on those sitting at the world's top table to set an example through their own behaviour. A good start would be for the G-20 members to send a clear signal that all human rights, economic, social or cultural rights, political or civil rights, are equally important. The USA has long denied the validity of economic and social rights and is not a state party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. China, on the other hand, is not a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The two countries should accede immediately to the respective treaties. All G-20 members should ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 2008. Signing up to international treaties, however, is only one step in what needs to be done.

...

New opportunities for change

Global poverty -- exacerbated by the economic situation -- has created a burning platform for human rights change. At the same time, the economic crisis has triggered a paradigm shift that opens up opportunities for systemic change.

For the past two decades, the state has been retreating or reneging on its human rights obligations in favour of the market in the belief that economic growth would lift all boats. With the tide receding and boats springing leaks, governments are radically changing their positions and talking about a new global financial architecture and international governance system in which the state plays a stronger role. That opens up an opportunity to also halt the retreat of the state from the social sphere and re-design a more human rights friendly model of the state than the one that has characterized international policy-making for the past 20 years. ...


Governments should also work together to resolve deadly conflicts. Given the inter-relationships, ignoring one crisis to focus on another is a sure recipe for aggravating both.

Will governments seize these opportunities to strengthen human rights? Will corporate actors and international financial institutions accept and live up to their human rights responsibilities? So far, human rights have barely figured in the diagnoses or the prescription being proposed by the international community.

History shows that most struggles for great change -- such as the abolition of slavery or the emancipation of women -- started not as the initiative of states but as the endeavour of ordinary people. Successes in establishing international justice or controlling the arms trade or abolishing the death penalty or fighting violence against women or putting global poverty and climate change on the international agenda are all largely due to the energy, creativity and persistence of millions of activists from around the globe. It is to people power that we must now turn to bring pressure to bear on our political leaders. ...


Almost 50 years ago, Amnesty International was created to demand the release of prisoners of conscience. Today we also "demand dignity" for prisoners of poverty so that they can change their own lives. I am confident that with the help and support of our millions of members, supporters and partners around the world we will succeed.


Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 2

IN X


Reply to all
Forward
Reply by chat
Filter messages like this
Print
Add to Contacts list
Delete this message
Report phishing
Report not phishing
Show original
Show in fixed width font
Show in variable width font
Message text garbled?
Why is this spam/nonspam?

Reply

|
africafocus@igc.org
to aadinar

show details Jun 1


Reply

Follow up message

  from africafocus@igc.org
to aadinar@sas.upenn.edu
date Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:47 PM
subject Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 2
mailed-by sas.upenn.edu


hide details Jun 1


Reply

Follow up message

Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 2

AfricaFocus Bulletin
Jun 1, 2009 (090601)
(Reposted from sources cited below)

Editor's Note

"There is still an enormous gap between the rhetoric of African governments, which claim to protect and respect human rights, and the daily reality where human rights violations remain the norm. ... So many people are living in utter destitution; so few of them have any chance to free themselves from poverty. Their dire situation is exacerbated by the failure of governments in the Africa region to provide basic social services, ensure respect for the rule of law, address corruption and be accountable to their people." - Amnesty International, 2009 annual report

Amnesty International's report, released in late May, covers economic, social, and cultural rights as well as civil and political rights, stressing the ways in which the global economic recession has exacerbated previously existing patterns of human rights violations. As noted in the launch speech by Amnesty Secretary-General Irene Khan, this marks a new level of emphasis on economic rights for the organization, and is the basis of Amnesty's new global campaign "Demand Dignity." Khan called on world leaders to recognize that it's not just the economy, to put human rights at the center of economic rescue plans, and to fix their own appalling human rights records.

For Khan's speech, and excerpts from the foreword to the report, see another AfricaFocus Bulletin sent out today (http://www.africafocus.org/docs09/hr0906a.php). This AfricaFocus Bulletin contains the regional overview for sub-Saharan Africa. For regional overviews and links to specific Africa country pages, see http://report2009.amnesty.org/en/regions/africa and http://report2009.amnesty.org/en/regions/middle-east-north-africa

++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++++++++

Amnesty International

Africa: The State of Africa's Human Rights

28 May 2009

The regional overview for Africa of Amnesty International's 2009 report on "The State of the World's Human Rights":

[The full report and additional briefing materials are available at http://thereport.amnesty.org/press-area/en Note that events referred to are in 2008.]

As in many countries across Africa, Guinea's population was hit hard by rising food and commodity prices during the year. Demonstrations erupted and the authorities believed that Karamba Dramé was one of the organizers of the protests. So they killed him.

The food crisis, which marked 2008 in Africa, had a disproportionate impact on vulnerable population groups, especially those already living in poverty. Across the Africa region, people demonstrated against the desperate social and economic situation and the sharp rise in living costs. While some demonstrations turned violent, leading to the destruction of private and public property, the authorities often repressed protests using excessive force. Security forces injured and killed numerous people who were claiming their right to an adequate standard of living, including the right to food. Protesters were arbitrarily arrested and detained. Some were ill-treated in detention or sentenced to prison terms after unfair trials. Most of the time, no investigations were carried out to identify those among the security forces responsible for the human rights violations committed while responding to the protests.

Deprivation

Millions across the region continued to be deprived of their basic needs in spite of the sustained economic growth in many countries in Africa during past years. People faced enormous challenges in securing a daily livelihood, often aggravated by marginalization or political repression, attempts to muffle their voices and render them powerless.

Despite such repression, demonstrators against the dire social and economic situation and the sharp rise in living costs took to the streets in numerous countries, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea, Mali, Mozambique, Senegal, Somalia and Zimbabwe.

The demonstrations, sometimes violent themselves, were usually met with yet more violence by the state. In late February security forces in Cameroon killed up to 100 people in response to violent protests in various towns against the escalating cost of living and low wages. Some of those killed were apparently shot in the head at close range. In Mozambique, the police killed three people and injured 30 others in February when live ammunition was used against people protesting against an increase in transport costs.

In Mali, marches were organized against the rise in the price of basic commodities and against plans to privatize the supply of water in Lere, in the north-west of the country. At least six people were injured in November, one of whom died later in hospital, when security forces shot at the demonstrators. In Burkina Faso, security forces arrested several hundred people, after demonstrations against rising living costs in Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso erupted into violence. At least 80 of those arrested were sentenced to prison terms without having had access to a lawyer.

In Zimbabwe, hundreds of activists protesting against the dramatic decline in the economy and social infrastructure were arrested and detained without charge. Many protests were broken up by the police, often using excessive force. The government continued to manipulate access to food for political motives even though by the end of the year the UN estimated that about five million people were in need of food aid. Thousands of people, mostly in rural areas, became displaced as a result of the state-sponsored political violence and no longer had access to their food stocks, land or other forms of livelihood.

Thousands of people continued to migrate to other countries hoping to improve their families' lives. Many, in desperation, took to the sea, putting their lives in the hands of ruthless traffickers. Hundreds of people leaving the Horn of Africa across the Gulf of Aden, in an attempt to reach Yemen, died during the journey. In Mauritania, hundreds of migrants, believed to be heading to Europe, were arbitrarily arrested and detained in the country. Many were detained in inhuman conditions and ill-treated before being expelled, frequently not to their countries of origin and without being able to challenge the expulsion decision.

The rapid urbanization and prevailing poverty in many African countries means that many people find themselves without adequate housing, often living in slums. They are at risk of being forcibly evicted by the authorities and while living in the slums frequently have no access to basic facilities, such as water and sanitation. In Lagos, Nigeria, numerous people were forcibly evicted without due process and subsequently did not receive compensation or alternative housing. In Chad, a presidential decree, issued during the state of emergency early in 2008, ordered the demolition of thousands of homes in the capital N'Djamena, as the authorities considered they had been built on government land without authorization. Tens of thousands of people became homeless and had to seek alternative accommodation. In Kenya, hundreds of families living close to the Nairobi River faced the threat of forced evictions after the government announced that people living in informal settlements close to the river needed to leave these areas.

Prison conditions in many countries remained well below inter- national standards, often linked to overcrowding. As ever, prisoners from poor families were worst affected as they often lacked the resources to ensure their basic needs while in detention.

Insecurity

Armed conflict and insecurity in several African countries forced hundreds of thousands of people to flee from their homes, trying to find international protection across borders or some form of security within their own country. In some of the worst armed conflicts still affecting the region, government forces and armed groups completely disregarded the dignity and physical integrity of the population. The civilian population was routinely the object of attacks by parties to the conflict; rape and other forms of sexual violence remained widespread; children were often recruited to take part in hostilities; and humanitarian workers were targeted. Those responsible for crimes under international law, committed in the context of these armed conflicts, were hardly ever held to account.

The role of UN and regional peacekeeping missions in Africa increased during 2008, but failed to make a significant impact in terms of protecting the civilian population. This was partly, but not entirely, the result of inadequate resources. The UN and regional bodies, such as the African Union, made little progress in resolving the armed conflicts in Sudan (Darfur), Chad, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (North Kivu).

The proliferation of small arms remained a significant contributing factor to the continuation of armed conflicts and to widespread human rights abuses. UN arms embargoes have not been effective.

The international community mobilized unprecedented resources to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia and to protect its commercial interests.

It made no such efforts, however, to halt the flow of arms to Somalia - despite a UN embargo. Nor did it act effectively to stop the widespread violations of international humanitarian law by all parties to the conflict; nor to hold those responsible for crimes under international law accountable.

Hundreds of thousands of people were also newly displaced as a result of the conflict in Somalia. Fighting in and around the capital Mogadishu has led to 16,000 deaths, and undocumented numbers of wounded, among the civilian population since January 2007. The Transitional Federal Government was not able to establish its authority across south central Somalia and lost ground to armed opposition groups. Humanitarian organizations had only limited access to provide emergency assistance to an estimated 3.2 million people in need. Aid workers, as well as journalists and human rights defenders, were often targeted for political and criminal reasons.

The armed conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo escalated again during the second half of 2008. Numerous human rights abuses were committed by all the parties to the conflict, including killings and abductions of civilians, rape and other forms of sexual violence, and the recruitment and use of children as armed fighters.

Hundreds of thousands of people fled the fighting.

The armed conflict in Darfur intensified throughout the year with no political resolution in sight. Attacks against civilians continued, as well as rape, looting and the destruction of villages. Millions of people remained internally displaced and humanitarian organizations often had no access to those in need because of the overall insecurity and the attacks on humanitarian convoys. As a result, thousands of people remained beyond the reach of emergency aid. People lacked protection from violence, even in internally displaced sites. In just one example in August, the authorities surrounded Kalma camp in South Darfur, opened fire and reportedly shelled the camp, killing 47 people.

The armed opposition group, Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), launched an attack against Omdurman, on the outskirts of the capital Khartoum in May. In the aftermath of the attack, the Sudanese authorities persecuted people thought to be of Darfuri origin. Hundreds of people were arbitrarily arrested and detained

  • many were tortured or otherwise ill-treated. There were also reports of extrajudicial executions.

Fighting also erupted in Abyei, South Sudan, between the Sudanese Armed Forces and forces of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), resulting in the destruction of the town, the displacement of 50,000 people, and additional strains on the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between North and South Sudan.

Tensions between Chad and Sudan rose again during 2008, especially after an attack in early February by Chadian armed opposition groups on N'Djamena. After two days of intense fighting, Chadian government forces repelled the attack. Subsequently, the government declared a state of emergency and arrested various members of the opposition, one of whom has become a victim of enforced disappearance. There were also reports of extrajudicial executions immediately after the attack. An estimated 50,000 people fled the violence in N'Djamena and sought refuge in neighbouring Cameroon.

Armed conflict was not the only source of widespread insecurity in the region in 2008. Political violence following elections also played its part in a number of countries. In Kenya, more than 1,000 people died as a result of politically motivated ethnic violence and associated police killings after the elections on 30 December 2007. Hundreds of thousands of people fled their areas of origin and some fled to neighbouring countries such as Uganda. In Zimbabwe, at least 180 people were killed and thousands injured as a result of state-sponsored political violence before and after the second round of presidential elections. Many continued to flee to neighbouring countries, particularly South Africa.

In both Kenya and Zimbabwe, the violence and insecurity not only affected the people's physical security, but also their capacity to earn a livelihood as thousands lost their homes, food supplies, access to land and other sources of income. Hundreds of thousands of people became dependent on humanitarian assistance for their basic needs as a result of political violence.

Tens of thousands of people fleeing xenophobic attacks in South Africa in May also became dependent on humanitarian assistance as they had to flee from their homes and lost all their possessions. Over 60 people were killed and more than 600 were injured after people were beaten, sexually assaulted and killed in various provinces, often by people living in the same community. These xenophobic attacks against individuals, targeted because of their perceived nationality, ethnicity or migrant status, were fuelled partly by the deprivation in which many South Africans still live. Official investigations failed to bring the perpetrators to justice, or to clarify the causes of the violence.

Exclusion

Many groups in African societies continued to face discrimination and exclusion from protection or the means to get redress for the abuses they suffered. In Uganda, for example, victims of numerous human rights abuses during the armed conflict in the north of the country remained destitute and traumatized, often excluded from any means of redress.

Across the Africa region, people suffered discrimination within their families and communities because of their gender or their HIV status, exacerbated by their poverty. In South Africa for example, where 5.7 million people were living with HIV, poor rural women continued to face barriers in accessing health services for HIV and AIDS due to unmanageable distances from health facilities and transport costs.

Stigma and gender-based discrimination, including violence, also affected the women's ability to protect themselves against HIV infection and to seek health care and support.

Women were also discriminated against in various societies under customary laws and traditional practices. The customary laws of certain ethnic groups in Namibia, for example, discriminate against women and girls, specifically laws on marriage and inheritance.

In various countries, notably Tanzania, albino people were murdered in what were believed to be ritual killings. Although the government of Tanzania denounced the killings, nobody was prosecuted in relation to them during 2008, even though a number of people were arrested.

People were persecuted for their (perceived) sexual orientation in countries including Cameroon, Gambia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal and Uganda. In various countries, same-sex sexual relationships were a criminal offence.

In many African countries the judicial system lacks independence. In addition, the justice system is often under-resourced, poorly equipped and understaffed, leading to excessive delays in hearing criminal cases.

For those with little access to financial resources, negotiating the criminal justice system can prove a nightmare.

In Nigeria, for example, those who are poor face numerous obstacles to obtaining a fair trial within an acceptable period of time. Although some efforts have been made to provide legal aid, it is not nearly enough to grant legal representation for all who need it but cannot afford to pay for a lawyer - even in cases carrying the death penalty.

The more than 700 people living on death row in Nigeria in 2008 all had one thing in common - they were poor.

However, in a landmark decision, the Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) ordered the government of Niger to pay reparations to a woman who had been held in domestic and sexual slavery for a decade, on the basis that the authorities had failed to implement existing laws against slavery.

Voice

Governments continued to restrict, without justification, the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly. However, efforts by governments to control information were also countered by increasingly vibrant civil societies, often working in partnership with each other, and stronger independent media.

Legislation or other forms of regulation were frequently used to restrict the work of civil society and the media. In Ethiopia, the authorities prepared a draft bill that criminalizes human rights activities and gives authorities an excessive level of control over civil society organizations. In Swaziland, the new Suppression of Terrorism Act, with its impermissibly broad definitions of terrorism, had a chilling effect on the activities of civil society organizations and infringed the rights of freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association. In Chad, a presidential decree to limit press freedom remained in place even after the state of emergency was lifted. In Sudan, censorship over privately owned media outlets was reinforced. In Rwanda, the space for independent media workers, including foreign journalists, remained restricted. In Lesotho, restrictive broadcasting regulations and the use of criminal defamation, sedition and similar charges continued to take their toll on individual media workers and infringed the right to freedom of expression. In Kenya, parliament passed a media bill, and in Uganda, the authorities were drafting legislation: both laws would further restrict press freedom. In Niger, the government imposed a media blackout on the conflict in the north of the country and banned journalists from travelling there.

In numerous countries, including Angola, Cameroon, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sudan, Tanzania and Togo, media outlets were suspended because the authorities disap- proved of their stories. Journalists were routinely arrested and sometimes charged with criminal offences, purely for carrying out their work.

Political opponents of the government were arbitrarily arrested and detained in Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Mauritania, Republic of Congo, Swaziland and Zimbabwe.

In some cases members of the political opposition were subjected to enforced disappearance or unlawfully killed. In other countries the space for political opposition, free speech and civil society was non-existent, such as in Eritrea.

Human rights defenders remained at risk in various countries and were often harassed and sometimes arrested for defending their rights as well as the rights of others. Journalists and human rights activists regularly had to flee their country because of security risks.

In Zimbabwe, numerous human rights activists, trade union representatives and political opposition members were arrested. Some were abducted and killed by government security forces as well as non-state actors working on behalf of the authorities. In Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad and Sudan, human rights defenders were also arrested. In some cases those detained were tortured or otherwise ill-treated. In a number of countries civil society organizations were closed down, or threatened with closure, by the authorities.

Accountability

Unless governments address impunity in a serious manner the widespread human rights violations across this region will continue. At the moment, those who abuse others' rights can continue to do so freely.

Occasionally, after large-scale human rights violations, commissions of inquiry or other types of investigative panels are set up, but they are often more to appease public opinion than to establish the truth and identify those responsible.

In Chad, a national commission of inquiry into hundreds of killings and other human rights violations in February 2008 published its report in September - no action was taken by the government to implement its recommendations. A commission of inquiry set up in Guinea to investigate human rights violations committed in 2006 and 2007 did not conduct any investigations. In Liberia, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission concluded its public hearings and its findings were pending by the end of the year. The commission of inquiry in Kenya, set up to investigate the post-election violence, made its findings public in October. Even though the government pledged to implement the recommendations in the report it had not, by the end of the year, put in place a comprehensive plan of action to do so.

Unfortunately, governments often use commissions of inquiry, or truth and reconciliation commissions, as surrogates for judicial inquiries, which are essential for establishing individual criminal responsibility.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) continued to pursue a number of cases from Africa. The application by the ICC Prosecutor for an arrest warrant to be issued against President Omar Al Bashir of Sudan for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide triggered efforts to undermine the work of the ICC by various states and regional bodies, including the African Union (AU). The AU, the League of Arab States and the Organization of the Islamic Conference called on the UN Security Council to defer the case. On the initiative of Rwanda, the AU adopted a decision criticizing what it called the abuse of universal jurisdiction.

While the ICC continued to pursue a number of cases from Africa, it can only prosecute a limited number of individuals. It is essential that national jurisdictions also investigate and prosecute those suspected of being responsible for crimes under international law, including by exercising universal jurisdiction. Regrettably, Senegal has only made limited progress in the case of former Chadian President Hissène Habré, indicating a lack of political will to initiate serious investigations.

On a more positive note, the AU adopted the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights in July. Once operational, the Court could contribute to ending impunity in Africa if AU member states agree to allow victims of human rights violations to approach the Court directly for an effective remedy.

Conclusion

There is still an enormous gap between the rhetoric of African governments, which claim to protect and respect human rights, and the daily reality where human rights violations remain the norm.

In 2008, Africans deprived of their rights took to the streets. Protests often became violent, with resentment fuelled by the repressive attitudes of governments towards dissent and protest. These protests are likely to continue.

So many people are living in utter destitution; so few of them have any chance to free themselves from poverty. Their dire situation is exacerbated by the failure of governments in the Africa region to provide basic social services, ensure respect for the rule of law, address corruption and be accountable to their people.

As the global economic outlook appears more and more gloomy, hope lies in the continuing vitality of civil societies across the region, and the determination of human rights defenders willing to challenge entrenched interests despite the risks they face.


from africafocus@igc.org

date Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM subject Africa: Economy and Human Rights, 1


Page Editor: Ali B. Ali-Dinar, Ph.D.

Previous Menu Home Page What's New Search Country Specific