Call for Applications: CODESRIA, The Role of Institutions in
African Development, 10/06
The CODESRIA Annual Social Science Campus
Call for Applications for the 2006 Session
Theme: The Role of Institutions in African Development
The Council for the Development of Social Science
Research in Africa (CODESRIA) is pleased to announce
the fifth session of its Annual Social Science Campus,
and invites applications from African scholars for
participation in the programme which, this year, is
scheduled to hold at the end of November 2006. The
Campus is conceived as an advanced research dialogue
that is both multidisciplinary and intergenerational in
nature. It is organised around a specific theme and up
to 15 scholars, drawn from different disciplines and
reflecting the different generations of African social
researchers, are elected to participate in the Campus.
This mix of participants is designed to have the added
value of promoting an intensive and critical dialogue
among the disciplines, as well as among different
generations of African scholars for the advancement of
theory, methodology and practice. Each Campus is
planned as an intensive interactive exercise to last a
period of one week.
Participation in the Campus is based primarily on the
submission of a draft research paper which contains
ideas for fresh, innovative work or the substantive
extension of work that is already in progress and
linked to the theme of the Campus. The proceedings of
the Campus are managed by a designated coordinator who
also takes on the responsibility for elaborating the
programme of presentations and debates among the
participants. Furthermore, the coordinator, working
with the CODESRIA Centre for Documentation (CODICE),
will be responsible for identifying core literature for
use by the participants in the Campus. Scholars whose
proposals are selected would be required to participate
in the Campus by presenting their own papers,
responding to the papers of other participants, and
undertaking a critical reading/re-reading of core texts
as part of an intensive multidisciplinary and
inter-generational dialogue. At the close of the
Campus, participants will be encouraged to revise their
presentations and submit these for consideration for
publication in a new series known as Annals of the
CODESRIA Annual Social Science Campus. Each publication
in the series will be edited by the designated
coordinator of the campus at which the papers were
presented.
For the 2006 session of the Annual Social Science
Campus, the theme that has been selected is: The Role
of Institutions in African Development. In the period
since the 1960s when African countries attained their
independence, scholars have made direct or indirect
references to the important role of institutions in
development and suggested, in the context of the
debates of the time, that the chief problem faced by
the emergent countries of Africa in their quest to
build democracy and development was the absence of
"modern" institutions. This position was widely
espoused but it was also equally robustly challenged on
a variety of theoretical and empirical grounds. In part
because of the widespread critique of the mainstream
modernisation approaches, the accent on institutions in
development as it emerged in the 1960s was to
experience some decline during the 1980s. It was,
however, given a new boost, that was also accompanied
by a much more nuanced and sophisticated frame of
analyses, following the renewed visibility which
institutional economics enjoyed in the wake of the
Nobel prize awarded to Douglas North. The works of
Douglas North inspired a host of other studies, mostly
set within the broader context of the development
debate, that sought to assess the nature, role, and
importance of institutions, understood in terms of
rules, norms and values, in successful socio-economic
transformation. Associated with this was the new lease
of life enjoyed by competing notions of trust and
social capital in the development process. The dominant
perspective that emerged was that (formal) institutions
matter for successful development and, in the light of
Africa's persistent underdevelopment, the problem
arising was the absence of appropriate (formal)
institutions or their systematic perversion by the
forces of neo-patrimonialism. There was, however, an
influential, if less audible critique which drew on
comparative historical research to argue that
institutional frameworks, useful as they may be, might
not actually be as decisive as assumed and, in some
cases, are outrightly agnostic to developmental
outcomes. Others have been more radical in their
challenge, point as they do to the ahistoricism that is
rampant in the current discourse on institutions and
the mystification of the institutional contexts and
traditions of the West around which the narrative of
much of New Institutional Economics is constructed.
Furthermore, it has been argued that on-going
institutional reforms in Africa, including particularly
efforts at re-organising property rights, have become a
shortcut to the widespread dispossession of the working
poor and the erosion of democratic governance.
The African context of the debate on institutions has
been marked by a relative absence of African voices
and, among the Africanists who have considered the
experiences presented by the continent, the temptation
has been to resort to formulaic prescriptions that
derive from and/or echo the one-size-fits-all
approaches to market reform in the heyday of IMF/World
Bank structural adjustment. Overall, the discussion has
revived or generated a variety of essentialisms derived
from a host of pathologies that are thought to underpin
the supposed African malaise: The prevalence of economy
of affection, moral economy, corruption,
neo-patrimonialism, presidentialism, etc.. In the worst
cases, it is suggested that Africa either has no
history of (formal) institutions or is afflicted with a
deficit of formal institutions which are overwhelmed by
informal institutions that have proved to be as
unyielding to change as they are obstructive of
development. In all cases, this analytic frame suggests
policy interventions aimed at inventing formal
institutions. Across Africa, irrespective of local
context and history, new and uniform institutional
processes and structures are being planted from above.
The 2006 Session of the Annual Social Science Campus is
designed to serve as a first step in the effort to
begin to remedy the silences, as seen from Africa, in
the debate on institutions, and move from there to
generate new perspectives that are adapted to the
historical circumstances and experiences of the
countries of the continent. Participants in the Campus
will be invited to develop theoretically-grounded
reflections on the issue of institutions in African
development with the accent placed on critical thinking
that can transcend the limitations of existing
discourses and, in so doing, help advance the frontiers
of the on-going debate. As may be necessary, they will
be encouraged to employ assessments of new institutions
introduced as part of the on-going donor reform agenda
to inform their analyses.
Scholars who are already reflecting on the problematic
of the institutions in African development and who have
innovative perspectives to share with other researchers
and the wider academy are invited to submit their
applications to reach the CODESRIA Secretariat not
later than 31 October, 2006. In addition to a
substantive proposal of not more than 10 pages
reflecting on-going work on this theme or proposed new
concerns that are to pursued, interested participants
should also send their current curriculum vitae.
Applications should be sent to
The CODESRIA Annual Social Science Campus,
Department of Training, Grants and Fellowships,
CODESRIA,
BP 3304,CP 18524,
Dakar, Senegal.
Tel: +221-8259822/23
Fax:+221-8241289
E-mail: annual.campus@codesria.sn
Website: www.codesria.org
Page Editor: Ali B. Ali-Dinar, Ph.D.